Schließen Zurück Alle Abschnitte einklappen
Prozess-Datensatz: A1 Fastbase (de) en

Kerninformationen des Datensatzes
Ort GB
Erläuterungen zur geographischen Repräsentativität United Kingdom
Referenzjahr 2025
Name
A1 Fastbase
Anwendungshinweis für Datensatz This LCA covers the Product (A1, A2 and A3), Use (B1), End of Life (C1 to C4) and Benefits/loads beyond the system boundary (D) Stages, as indicated above. This is termed: "Cradle to gate with options, modules C1 to C4, and module D". A schematic of these stages is covered in the flow diagram illustration below.
Technisches Anwendungsgebiet Reinforced concrete communications chamber. The mass of the Fastbase unit is 8.786 tonnes. The concrete comprises specialised cements, aggregates and water. Reinforcing steel has a recycled content of 100% recycled steel. Fastbase unit complies with I.S. EN 13369 Common rules for precast concrete. products. Concrete complies with I.S. EN 206 :2013 -Concrete Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity.
Allgemeine Anmerkungen zum Datensatz Data quality: Time Representativeness: In this LCA the data relating to the usages, emissions and materials, and the data relating to the bespoke background processes for environmental impacts are less than 2 years apart, and also the Ecoinvent database version 3.9.1.. Time Representativeness is considered to be Very good. Geographical Representativeness: The processes used in the production of the concrete products are geographically representative, insofar as the production location (England) lies within the region for which the relevant Ecoinvent (version 3.9.1) environmental records have been selected. The dataset is up-to-date and representative for the current technology used in the processes of manufacturing the products. Geographical Representativeness is considered to be Very good. Technical Representativeness: Processes and energies used in the process have been modelled exactly as described by Banagher Precast, and are based directly on the production data supplied by Banagher Precast, in relation to raw materials, processes, fuels used and emissions, and without any significant need for improvement. Technical Representativeness is considered to be Very good. Allocation: The measurement of environmental impacts in this EPD uses the LCIA methodologies recommended for PEF 3.1. In this EPD, the waste processes are allocated in the relevant module. In the case of the use of secondary materials or energy recovered from secondary fuels, the system boundary between the system under study and the previous system (providing the secondary materials) is set where outputs of the previous system, e.g. materials, products, building elements or energy, reach the end-of-waste state. The modularity and the polluter payer principles have been followed. Cut-off criteria: All relevant inputs and outputs - like emissions, energy and materials - have been taken into account in this LCA, and in accordance with EN15804+A2:2019. The study covers at least 95% of the materials and energy per module and at least 99% of the total use of materials and energy of each unit process. Long term emissions have been excluded from the study.
Copyright Ja
Eigentümer des Datensatzes
Quantitative Referenz
Referenzfluss(flüsse)
Biogener Kohlenstoffanteil
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Zeitliche Repräsentativität
Datensatz gültig bis 2030
Erläuterungen zur zeitlichen Repräsentativität "2025-08-28" - "2030-08-27"
Technologische Repräsentativität
Technische Beschreibung inklusive der Hintergrundsysteme Mean density of concrete: 2,400 kg/m3

Parameter zur Beschreibung des Ressourceneinsatzes und sonstige Umweltinformationen

IndikatorRichtungEinheit Nutzung
B1
 Energieeinsatz
B6
 Wassereinsatz
B7
 Abbruch
C1
 Transport
C2
 Abfallbehandlung
C3
 Beseitigung
C4
 Recyclingpotential
D
Use of renewable primary energy (PERE)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.069
  • 18.23
  • 2.523
  • 0
  • -29.26
Use of renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PERM)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Total use of renewable primary energy resource (PERT)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.069
  • 18.23
  • 2.523
  • 0
  • -29.26
Use of non renewable primary energy (PENRE)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1134
  • 1233
  • 471.4
  • 0
  • -481.9
Use of non renewable primary energy resources used as raw materials (PENRM)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Total use of non renewable primary energy resource (PENRT)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1134
  • 1233
  • 471.4
  • 0
  • -481.9
Use of secondary material (SM)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of renewable secondary fuels (RSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of non renewable secondary fuels (NRSF)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Use of net fresh water (FW)
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.07498
  • 0.1557
  • 0.03117
  • 0
  • -0.9795
Hazardous waste disposed (HWD)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007179
  • 0.007379
  • 0.002984
  • 0
  • -0.002679
Non hazardous waste dispose (NHWD)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.526
  • 57.62
  • 0.6343
  • 0
  • -2.462
Radioactive waste disposed (RWD)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001169
  • 0.0003813
  • 0.00004857
  • 0
  • -0.0001817
Components for re-use (CRU)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for recycling (MFR)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5928
  • 0
  • 0
Materials for energy recovery (MER)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exported electrical energy (EEE)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Exported thermal energy (EET)
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndikatorEinheit Nutzung
B1
 Energieeinsatz
B6
 Wassereinsatz
B7
 Abbruch
C1
 Transport
C2
 Abfallbehandlung
C3
 Beseitigung
C4
 Recyclingpotential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1067
  • 1.16E+3
  • 443.4
  • 0
  • -452.9
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002843
  • 0.000267
  • 0.00001182
  • 0
  • -0.00008864
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7549
  • 0.1785
  • 0.3138
  • 0
  • -0.7113
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001295
  • 0.000001778
  • 5.385E-7
  • 0
  • -4.958E-7
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002941
  • 0.0006634
  • 0.0001223
  • 0
  • -0.0005685
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3495
  • 0.04395
  • 0.1453
  • 0
  • -0.2485
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.804
  • 0.4576
  • 1.581
  • 0
  • -3.456
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01869
  • 0.07482
  • 0.007768
  • 0
  • 0.04222
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • -80.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 81.45
  • 81.66
  • 33.86
  • 0
  • -37.42
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.009166
  • 0.04032
  • 0.00381
  • 0
  • -0.01691
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • -80.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 81.47
  • 81.78
  • 33.87
  • 0
  • -37.39
Global warming potential except emissions and uptake of biogenic carbon (GWP-IOBC/GHG)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.126
  • 0.2771
  • 0.4683
  • 0
  • -0.7775
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.311
  • 4.802
  • 0.9607
  • 0
  • -40.47

IndikatorEinheit Nutzung
B1
 Energieeinsatz
B6
 Wassereinsatz
B7
 Abbruch
C1
 Transport
C2
 Abfallbehandlung
C3
 Beseitigung
C4
 Recyclingpotential
D
1Diese Wirkungskategorie behandelt hauptsächlich die mögliche Wirkung einer ionisierenden Strahlung geringer Dosis auf die menschliche Gesundheit im Kernbrennstoffkreislauf. Sie berücksichtigt weder Auswirkungen, die auf mögliche nukleare Unfälle und berufsbedingte Exposition zurückzuführen sind, noch auf die Entsorgung radioaktiver Abfälle in unterirdischen Anlagen. Die potenzielle vom Boden, von Radon und von einigen Baustoffen ausgehende ionisierende Strahlung wird ebenfalls nicht von diesem Indikator gemessen.
2Die Ergebnisse dieses Umweltwirkungsindikators müssen mit Bedacht angewendet werden, da die Unsicherheiten bei diesen Ergebnissen hoch sind oder da es mit dem Indikator nur begrenzte Erfahrungen gibt.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 509.8
  • 573.5
  • 211.9
  • 0
  • -5.1E+2
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.494E-8
  • 3.723E-8
  • 1.037E-8
  • 0
  • -1.856E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.734E-7
  • 8.231E-7
  • 7.207E-8
  • 0
  • -2.234E-7
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2181
  • 0.5878
  • 0.09065
  • 0
  • -0.2962
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 71.85
  • 701.2
  • 29.87
  • 0
  • -1349
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002104
  • 0.00000606
  • 0.00005283
  • 0
  • -0.00001099